đ¤Śââď¸ Why Bitcoin is Stupid (Revisited)
FIRE BTC #48 - Mr. Money Mustache doubles down
Mr. Money Mustache, the O.G. FIRE promoter, is at it again.
He appeared as a guest on the Bigger Pockets Money podcast and was asked about bitcoin toward the end. Unsurprisingly, he reiterated his stance that âbitcoin is stupidâ and you should not âinvestâ in it.
Here is the clip:
About a year ago, I kicked off the FIRE BTC newsletter by calling out MMM on his 2018 post. Bitcoinâs value is almost double where it was when the newsletter was launched, and itâs 10x the value from his blog post 7 years ago.
MMM still thinks bitcoin is stupid. Hereâs why heâs wrongâŚ
đ˛ âBitcoin is like a dice roll that has just been continuing to come up on sixesâ
This is MMMâs way of brushing off Bitcoinâs 15-year track record as dumb luck. If the price keeps going up, it must just be chance, right?
Thatâs a lazy analogy. A dice roll is random. Bitcoinâs success is anything but. Its track record isnât built on luck â itâs built on fundamentals:
Perfectly fixed supply: 21 million, forever immovable and unchangeable.
Growing global adoption: from cypherpunks to millions of individuals, corporations, and even governments.
Utility as money: scarce, portable, and incorruptible.
To dismiss all of that as âluckâ shows no intellectual curiosity about why people value bitcoin. If youâre serious about financial independence, you should at least ask the question: what would make millions of people worldwide adopt this as their savings vehicle?
The answer isnât luck.
đ âBitcoin is entirely dependent on belief. It doesnât generate income. Itâs speculation, not an investment.â
He continues: âIâd rather own something that generates ongoing income like a rental house or a business.â
MMM uses a narrow definition of âinvestmentâ: something that spits off dividends or rent checks. Anything else, in his view, is speculation.
But most FIRE folks arenât âinvestorsâ in that sense either. Buying VTSAX means specifically not doing the things youâd do when assessing a particular business â analyzing cash flows, reading balance sheets, or calculating earnings multiples. Itâs simply saving. You buy the whole market and bet that it will continue to preserve and grow your purchasing power as it has done historically.
Bitcoin does the same thing â only more directly and more potently. Its fundamentals are the qualities that make it the soundest form of money humanity has ever had. Its permanently fixed supply makes it more scarce than any other savings option. It is decentralized, meaning no one can control it, dilute it, or confiscate it. And it is portable and self-custodied, giving individuals direct ownership without relying on a gatekeeper. Itâs the first true savings technology of the digital age â superior in many fundamental ways to MMMâs preferred âinvestments.â
Now, rental houses and businesses do generate cash flow, and thereâs nothing wrong with that. But MMM makes a performative contradiction: thatâs not what he actually advocates for in his own FIRE strategy. He tells his followers to put their money into VTSAX, a broad stock market index, which is not primarily about income, but appreciation. In fact, the entire FIRE methodology â the 4% rule and the dream of early retirement â depends on your portfolio growing in value over decades and then being sold down gradually to fund expenses.
Thatâs saving and speculation. Youâre betting the market will keep going up. And historically, it has. But the same logic applies to bitcoin: its value grows as adoption spreads and demand increases against a fixed supply.
So if youâre fine with owning VTSAX to save, and your whole approach to personal finance depends on its value increasing, dismissing bitcoin as ânot an investmentâ because it has no cash flows makes zero sense. Theyâre both bets on future price appreciation. Bitcoin just happens to be the stronger one.
đ âThis article [his 2018 post] is not about the price.â
MMM insists his critique of bitcoin has nothing to do with price â that even if it went to one cent or four quadrillion dollars, itâs still just speculation.
But price is the clearest signal of adoption in a fixed-supply asset. With bitcoin, the only way price rises over time is if more people choose to hold it. Thatâs a pure reflection of growing utility and demand.
The irony here was already stated above, but Iâll repeat it: the traditional FIRE path is just as dependent on price. The entire 4% rule works only if the market keeps going up. Without long-term appreciation in stocks, nobody retires early. Thatâs the foundation of the strategy.
So dismissing bitcoinâs price as irrelevant while depending on stock market growth is a double standard.
đ° âI donât need bitcoin. Iâm already financially abundant and retired.â
Thatâs great for MMM â truly. Retiring at 30 is an impressive achievement, and heâs clearly done something right.
The problem is that thousands of people look to him for advice, and heâs telling them to ignore the most successful asset of the past 15 years without even taking a serious look at why it works. That blind spot has cost his followers precious time â maybe years of their working lives â that they could have bought back with bitcoin. How much wealthier would his followers be today if they had used even 10% of their savings to buy bitcoin instead of stocks?
It also comes from a place of privilege. MMM can access U.S. index funds. He has a stable banking system. Heâs playing the game from the best seat at the table. Millions of people worldwide donât have that luxury. For them, bitcoin may be the only way to save in something that canât be inflated, confiscated, or closed off by their government.
MMM insists he doesnât need bitcoin, but the reality is that it doesnât matter. He already owns it indirectly. The broad market index funds he champions include companies with bitcoin on their balance sheets. Over time, more and more of the returns in the stock market will be powered by bitcoinâs growth. Whether he likes it or not, heâs exposed.
So he can keep saying he doesnât need bitcoin. But the truth is, he already has it.
Thatâs it for this week â thanks for reading!
Until next time,
Trey âď¸
I'd love your opinion on Bitcoin income etfs. Its a rapidly expanding space. My favorites are btci and bity. I think I'd rather own them through a Bitcoin winter than straight BTC. Could be a good topic for your next post. Thanks.
These are incredible to watch. The mental gymnastics required to stay ignorant is something to witness. He may be right but not willing to admit he MAY be missing something is just pure problem of Ego.